Abstract

For a positive integer nn, a collection SS of subsets of [n]={1,…,n}[n]=\{1,\ldots,n\} is called symmetric if X∈SX\in S implies X∗∈SX^\ast\in S, where X∗:={i∈[n] ⁣:n−i+1∉X}X^\ast:=\{i\in [n]\colon n-i+1\notin X\} (the involution ∗\ast was introduced by Karpman). Leclerc and Zelevinsky showed that the set of maximal strongly (resp. weakly) separated collections in 2[n]2^{[n]} is connected via flips, or mutations, ``in the presence of six (resp. four) witnesses''. We give a symmetric analog of those results, by showing that each maximal symmetric strongly (weakly) separated collection in 2[n]2^{[n]} can be obtained from any other one by a series of special symmetric local transformations, so-called symmetric flips. Also we establish the connectedness via symmetric flips for the class of maximal symmetric rr-separated collections in 2[n]2^{[n]} when n,rn,r are even (where sets A,B⊆[n]A,B\subseteq [n] are called rr-separated if there are no elements i0<i1<⋯<ir+1i_0<i_1< \cdots <i_{r+1} in [n][n] which alternate in A∖BA\setminus B and B∖AB\setminus A). This is related to a symmetric version of higher Bruhat orders. These results are obtained as consequences of our study of related geometric objects: symmetric rhombus and combined tilings and symmetric cubillages.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.