Paper detail

Flicker noise pulsar radio spectra

We present new results of fitting 108 spectra of radio pulsars with the flicker noise model proposed by Loehmer et al. (2008) and compare them with the spectral indices of power-law fits published by Maron et al. (2000). The fits to the model were carried out using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method appropriate for the non-linear fits. Our main conclusion is that pulsar radio spectra can be statistically very well described by the flicker noise model over wide frequency range from a few tens of MHz up to tens of GHz. Moreover, our dataset allows us to conduct statistical analysis of the model parameters. As our results show, there is a strong negative correlation between the flicker noise spectrum model parameters log $S_0$ and $n$ and a strong positive relationship between n and the power-law spectral index $α$. The latter implies that their physical meaning is similar, however the flicker noise model has an advantage over broken power-law model. Not only it describes the spectra in higher frequency range with only two parameters, not counting scaling factor $S_0$, but also it shows smooth transition from flat to steep behaviour at lower and higher frequencies, respectively. On the other hand, there are no correlations of the flicker noise model parameters $S_0$, $τ$ and $n$ with any of pulsar physical properties.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.