Paper detail

Flexible Ramping Product Procurement in Day-Ahead Markets

This article puts forward a methodology for procuring flexible ramping products (FRPs) in the day-ahead market (DAM). The proposed methodology comprises two market passes, the first of which employs a stochastic unit commitment (SUC) model that explicitly evaluates the uncertainty and the intra-hourly and inter-hourly variability of net load so as to minimize the expected total operating cost. The second pass clears the DAM while imposing FRP requirements. The cornerstone of our work is to set the FRP requirements at levels that drive the DAM decisions toward the optimal SUC decisions. Our methodology provides an economic underpinning for the stipulated FRP requirements, and it brings forth DAM awards that reduce the costs toward the expected total cost under SUC, while conforming to the chief DAM design principles. By preemptively considering the dispatch costs before awarding FRPs, it can further avert unexpectedly high costs that could result with the deployment of procured FRPs. We conduct numerical studies and lay out the relative merits of the proposed methodology vis-à-vis selected benchmarks based on various evaluation metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.