Paper detail

Flexible Models for Galaxy Star Formation Histories Both Shift and Scramble the Optical Color-M/L Relationship

The remarkably tight relationship between galaxy optical color and stellar mass-to-light ratio ($M_*/L$) is widely used for efficient stellar mass estimates. However, it remains unclear whether this low scatter comes from a natural order in the galaxy population, or whether it is driven by simple relationships in the models used to describe them. In this work we investigate the origins of the relationship by contrasting the derived relationship from a simple 4-parameter SED model with a more sophisticated 14-dimensional Prospector-$α$ model including nonparametric star formation histories (SFHs). We apply these models to 63,430 galaxies at $0.5<z<3$ and fit a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) to the population distribution in the $(g-r)$--$\log(M/L_g)$ plane. We find that Prospector-$α$ infers systematically higher $M_*/L$ by 0.12 dex, a result of nonparametric SFHs producing older ages, and also systematically redder rest-frame $(g-r)$ by 0.06 mag owing to the contribution from nebular emission. Surprisingly, the combined effects of the $M_*/L$ and $(g-r)$ offsets produce a similar average relationship for the two models, though Prospector-$α$ produces a higher scatter of 0.28 dex compared to the simple model of 0.12 dex. Also, unlike the simple model, the Prospector-$α$ relationship shows substantial redshift evolution due to stellar aging. These expected and testable effects produce overall older and redder galaxies, though the color--$M_*/L$ relationship is measured only at $0.5<z<3$. Finally, we demonstrate that the HBM produces substantial shrinkage in the individual posteriors of faint galaxies, an important first step toward using the observed galaxy population directly to inform the SED fitting priors.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.