Paper detail

Flexible Caching in Trie Joins

Traditional algorithms for multiway join computation are based on rewriting the order of joins and combining results of intermediate subqueries. Recently, several approaches have been proposed for algorithms that are "worst-case optimal" wherein all relations are scanned simultaneously. An example is Veldhuizen's Leapfrog Trie Join (LFTJ). An important advantage of LFTJ is its small memory footprint, due to the fact that intermediate results are full tuples that can be dumped immediately. However, since the algorithm does not store intermediate results, recurring joins must be reconstructed from the source relations, resulting in excessive memory traffic. In this paper, we address this problem by incorporating caches into LFTJ. We do so by adopting recent developments on join optimization, tying variable ordering to tree decomposition. While the traditional usage of tree decomposition computes the result for each bag in advance, our proposed approach incorporates caching directly into LFTJ and can dynamically adjust the size of the cache. Consequently, our solution balances memory usage and repeated computation, as confirmed by our experiments over SNAP datasets.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.