Paper detail

Flexibility and analytic smoothing in averaging theory

Using a new strategy, we extend the classical Nekhoroshev's estimates to the case of Hölder regular steep near-integrable hamiltonian systems, the stability times being polynomially long in the inverse of the size of the perturbation. We prove that the stability exponents can be taken to be $(\ell-1)/(2nα_1...α_{n-2})$ for the time of stability and $1/(2nα_1...α_{n-1})$ for the radius of stability, $\ell >n+1$ being the regularity and the $α_i$'s being the indices of steepness. Our strategy consists in deriving a perturbation theory which exploits a sharp analytic smoothing theorem to approximate any Hölder function by an analytic one. In addition, an appropriate choice of the free parameters in the problem enables us to have a first grasp on the relation connecting the time and radius of stability to the threshold that the size of the perturbation must satisfy in order for the theorem to apply. Particular attention is payed to a geometric presentation of the construction of the so-called "resonant blocks", in order to shed a definitive light on the nature of the steepness condition. We also investigate the convex setting, using a similar approach.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.