Paper detail

Flavor signatures of complex anomalous $tcZ$ couplings

In this work we study the effects of anomalous $tcZ$ couplings. Such couplings would potentially affect several neutral current decays of $K$ and $B$ mesons via $Z$-penguin diagrams. Using constraints from relevant observables in $K$ and $B$ sectors, we find that the 2$σ$ upper bound on the branching ratio of ${\cal B}(t \to c Z)$ is $1.47 \times 10^{-5}$ for real coupling and $1.91 \times 10^{-4}$ for complex coupling. The current experimental upper bound from ATLAS and CMS collaborations on the branching ratio of $t \to c Z$ are $2.4 \times 10^{-4}$ and $4.9\times 10^{-4}$ at $95\%$ C.L., respectively. Hence the possibility of observation of $t \to c Z$ decay at the level of $10^{-4}$ would imply the anomalous couplings to be complex. Such complex couplings should also show up its presence in other related decays. We find that an order of magnitude enhancement is possible in the branching ratio of $K_L \to π^0 ν\barν$. Further, the complex $tcZ$ coupling can also provide large enhancements in many $CP$ violating angular observables in $B \to K^* μ^+ μ^-$ decay.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.