Paper detail

Flavor decomposition of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors

Background: The spatial distribution of charge and magnetization in the proton and neutron are encoded in the nucleon electromagnetic form factors. The form factors are all approximated by a simple dipole function, normalized to the charge or magnetic moment of the nucleon. The differences between the proton and neutron form factors and the deviation of GEn from zero are sensitive to the difference between up- and down-quark contributions to the form factors. Methods: We combine recent measurements of the neutron form factors with updated extractions of the proton form factors, accounting for two-photon exchange corrections and including an estimate of the uncertainties for all of the form factors to obtain a complete set of measurements up to Q^2 approximately 4 (GeV/c)^2. We use this to extract the up- and down-quark contributions which we compare to recent fits and calculations. Results: We find a large differences between the up- and down-quark contributions to G_E and G_M, implying significant flavor dependence in the charge and magnetization distributions. The rapid falloff of the ratio GEp/GMp does not appear in the individual quark form factors, but arises from a cancellation between the up- and down-quark contributions. We see indications that the down-quark contributions to the Dirac and Pauli form factors deviate from the suggested 1/Q^4 scaling behavior suggested by a previous analysis. Finally, while recent models provide a generally good qualitative description of the data, the down-quark contribution to G_E/G_M and F_2/F_1 are not reproduced by any of the models. Finally, we note that while the inclusion of recent $\gmn$ data from CLAS modifies the high-$Q^2$ slightly, the tension between these data and previous measurements at lower $Q^2$ has a more significant impact, suggesting the need for additional data in this region.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.