Paper detail

Flattened velocity dispersion profiles in Globular Clusters: Newtonian tides or modified gravity?

Over the past couple of years, a number of observational studies have confirmed the flattening of the radial velocity dispersion profiles for stars in various nearby globular clusters. As the projected radial coordinate is increased, a radius appears beyond which, the measured velocity dispersion ceases to drop and settles at a fixed value, $σ_{\infty}$. Under Newtonian gravity, this is explained by invoking tidal heating from the overall Milky Way potential on the outer, more loosely bound stars, of the globular clusters in question. From the point of view of modified gravity theories, such an outer flattening is expected on crossing the critical acceleration threshold $a_{0}$, beyond which, a transition to MONDian dynamics is expected, were equilibrium velocities cease to be a function of distance. In this paper we attempt to sort out between the above competing explanations, by looking at their plausibility in terms of an strictly empirical approach. We determine Newtonian tidal radii using masses accurately calculated through stellar population modelling, and hence independent of any dynamical assumptions, distances, size and orbital determinations for a sample of 16 globular clusters. We show that their Newtonian tidal radii at perigalacticon are generally larger that the radii at which the flattening in the velocity dispersion profiles occurs, by large factors of 4, on average. While this point makes the Newtonian tidal explanation suspect, it is found that the radii at which the flattening is observed on average correlate with the radii where the $a_{0}$ threshold is crossed, and that $σ_{\infty}$ values scale with the fourth root of the total masses, all features predicted under modified gravity theories.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.