Paper detail

Flare Activity and Magnetic Feature Analysis of the Flare Stars II: Sub-Giant Branch

We present an investigation of the magnetic activity and flare characteristics of the sub-giant stars mostly from F and G spectral types and compare the results with the main-sequence (MS) stars. The light curve of 352 stars on the sub-giant branch (SGB) from the Kepler mission is analyzed in order to infer stability, relative coverage and contrast of the magnetic structures and also flare properties using three flare indexes. The results show that: (i) Relative coverage and contrast of the magnetic features along with rate, power and magnitude of flares increase on the SGB due to the deepening of the convective zone and more vigorous magnetic field production (ii) Magnetic activity of the F and G-type stars on the SGB does not show dependency to the rotation rate and does not obey the saturation regime. This is the opposite of what we saw for the main sequence, in which the G-, K- and M-type stars show clear dependency to the Rossby number; (iii) The positive relationship between the magnetic features stability and their relative coverage and contrast remains true on the SGB, though it has lower dependency coefficient in comparison with the MS; (iv) Magnetic proxies and flare indexes of the SGB stars increase with increasing the relative mass of the convective zone.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.