Paper detail

Flamelet modeling of thermo-diffusively unstable hydrogen-air flames

In order to reduce CO2 emissions, hydrogen combustion has become increasingly relevant for technical applications. In this context, lean H2-air flames show promising features but, among other characteristics, they tend to exhibit thermo-diffusive instabilities. The formation of cellular structures associated with these instabilities leads to an increased flame surface area which further promotes the flame propagation speed, an important reference quantity for design, control, and safe operation of technical combustors. While many studies have addressed the physical phenomena of intrinsic flame instabilities in the past, there is also a demand to predict such flame characteristics with reduced-order models to allow computationally efficient simulations. In this work, a H2-air spherical expanding flame, which exhibits thermo-diffusive instabilities, is studied with flamelet-based modeling approaches both in a-priori and a-posteriori manner. A recently proposed Flamelet/Progress Variable (FPV) model, with a manifold based on unstretched planar flames, and a novel FPV approach, which takes into account a large curvature variation in the tabulated manifold, are compared to detailed chemistry (DC) calculations. First, both FPV approaches are assessed in terms of an a-priori test with the DC reference dataset. Thereafter, the a-posteriori assessment contains two parts: a linear stability analysis of perturbed planar flames and the simulation of the spherical expanding flame. Both FPV models are systematically analyzed considering global and local flame properties in comparison to the DC reference data. It is shown that the new FPV model, incorporating large curvature variations in the manifold, leads to improved predictions for the microstructure of the corrugated flame front and the formation of cellular structures, while global flame properties are reasonably well reproduced by both models.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.