Paper detail

Fitting Metrics and Ultrametrics with Minimum Disagreements

Given $x \in (\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})^{\binom{[n]}{2}}$ recording pairwise distances, the METRIC VIOLATION DISTANCE (MVD) problem asks to compute the $\ell_0$ distance between $x$ and the metric cone; i.e., modify the minimum number of entries of $x$ to make it a metric. Due to its large number of applications in various data analysis and optimization tasks, this problem has been actively studied recently. We present an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for MVD, exponentially improving the previous best approximation ratio of $O(OPT^{1/3})$ of Fan et al. [ SODA, 2018]. Furthermore, a major strength of our algorithm is its simplicity and running time. We also study the related problem of ULTRAMETRIC VIOLATION DISTANCE (UMVD), where the goal is to compute the $\ell_0$ distance to the cone of ultrametrics, and achieve a constant factor approximation algorithm. The UMVD can be regarded as an extension of the problem of fitting ultrametrics studied by Ailon and Charikar [SIAM J. Computing, 2011] and by Cohen-Addad et al. [FOCS, 2021] from $\ell_1$ norm to $\ell_0$ norm. We show that this problem can be favorably interpreted as an instance of Correlation Clustering with an additional hierarchical structure, which we solve using a new $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for correlation clustering that has the structural property that it outputs a refinement of the optimum clusters. An algorithm satisfying such a property can be considered of independent interest. We also provide an $O(\log n \log \log n)$ approximation algorithm for weighted instances. Finally, we investigate the complementary version of these problems where one aims at choosing a maximum number of entries of $x$ forming an (ultra-)metric. In stark contrast with the minimization versions, we prove that these maximization versions are hard to approximate within any constant factor assuming the Unique Games Conjecture.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.