Paper detail

Fishing massive black hole binaries with THAMES

Hierarchical mergers in a dense environment are one of the primary formation channels of intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) binary system. We expect that the resulting massive binary system will exhibit mass asymmetry. The emitted gravitational-wave (GW) carry significant contribution from higher-order modes and hence complex waveform morphology due to superposition of different modes. Further, IMBH binaries exhibit lower merger frequency and shorter signal duration in the LIGO detector which increases the risk of them being misclassified as short-duration noisy glitches. Deep learning algorithms can be trained to discriminate noisy glitches from short GW transients. We present the $\mathtt{THAMES}$ -- a deep-learning-based end-to-end signal detection algorithm for GW signals from quasi-circular nearly edge-on, mass asymmetric IMBH binaries in advanced GW detectors. Our study shows that it outperforms matched-filter based $\mathtt{PyCBC}$ searches for higher mass asymmetric, nearly edge-on IMBH binaries. The maximum gain in the sensitive volume-time product for mass ratio $q \in (5, 10)$ is by a factor of 5.24 (2.92) against $\mathtt{PyCBC-IMBH}$ ($\mathtt{PyCBC-HM}$) search at a false alarm rate of 1 in 100 years. Compared to the broad $\mathtt{PyCBC}$ search this factor is $\sim100$ for the $q \in (10,18)$. One of the reasons for this leap in volumetric sensitivity is its ability to discriminate between signals with complex waveform morphology and noisy transients, clearly demonstrating the potential of deep learning algorithms in probing into complex signal morphology in the field of gravitational wave astronomy. With the current training set, $\mathtt{THAMES}$ slightly underperforms with respect to $\mathtt{PyCBC}$-based searches targeting intermediate-mass black hole binaries with mass ratio $q \in (5, 10)$ and detector frame total mass $M_T(1+z) \in (100,200)~M_\odot$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.