Paper detail

Fisher information analysis of list-mode SPECT emission data for joint estimation of activity and attenuation distribution

The potential to perform attenuation and scatter compensation (ASC) in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using only the SPECT emission data is highly significant. In this context, attenuation in SPECT is primarily due to Compton scattering, where the probability of Compton scatter is proportional to the attenuation coefficient of the tissue and the energy of the scattered photon and the scattering angle are related. Given this premise, we investigate whether the SPECT scattered-photon data acquired in list-mode (LM) format and including the energy information can be used to estimate the attenuation map. For this purpose, we propose a Fisher-information-based method that yields the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for the task of jointly estimating the activity/attenuation distribution using only the SPECT emission data. The proposed method is applied to analyze the information content of SPECT LM emission data in a 2D SPECT system using computational studies with digital phantoms for different photon-count levels. The results show that scattered photons contain information to estimate the attenuation coefficients. An increase in the number of detected photons leads to lower CRB for both the attenuation and activity coefficients. Also, the CRB obtained for the attenuation and activity coefficients is typically much lower than the true value of these coefficients. Further, processing the emission data in LM format yields a lower CRB in comparison to binning data. Finally, we observe that systems with better energy resolution yield a lower CRB for the attenuation coefficient. Overall, the results provide strong evidence that LM SPECT emission data, including the scattered photons, contains information to jointly estimate the activity and attenuation coefficients.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.