Paper detail

First versus second generation planet formation in post common envelope binary (PCEB) planetary systems

We examine planets orbiting post-common envelope binaries (PCEBs) from the perspective of angular momentum evolution, and conclude that the planets are more likely to be first generation (FG) planets than second generation (SG) planets. FG planets were born together with the parent stars, while SG planets form later from a SG proto-planetary disk formed by mass-loss from the evolved primary star during its red giant branch (RGB) phase or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase. We find that in some systems the SG scenario requires that more than twenty percent of the SG proto-planetary disk mass ends in planets. Although we cannot rule out SG planet formation in these systems, this fraction of mass that ends in planets is much higher than the value commonly used in planet formation theories. On the other hand, we find that for each of the systems we can build a progenitor system composed of a main-sequence binary system orbited by the appropriate planets. This can be done if the secondary star was in a resonance with the inner planet. To account for the progenitor properties we suggest that in cases where the secondary star has a mass of ~ 0.1-0.2Msun, it was formed in the same way planets are formed, i.e., from a disk.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.