Paper detail

First spectrally-resolved H$_2$ observations towards HH 54 / Low H$_2$O abundance in shocks

Context: Herschel observations suggest that the H$_2$O distribution in outflows from low-mass stars resembles the H$_2$ emission. It is still unclear which of the different excitation components that characterise the mid- and near-IR H$_2$ distribution is associated with H$_2$O. Aim: The aim is to spectrally resolve the different excitation components observed in the H$_2$ emission. This will allow us to identify the H$_2$ counterpart associated with H$_2$O and finally derive directly an H$_2$O abundance estimate with respect to H$_2$. Methods: We present new high spectral resolution observations of H$_2$ 0-0 S(4), 0-0 S(9), and 1-0 S(1) towards HH 54, a bright nearby shock region in the southern sky. In addition, new Herschel-HIFI H$_2$O (2$_{12}$$-$1$_{01}$) observations at 1670~GHz are presented. Results: Our observations show for the first time a clear separation in velocity of the different H$_2$ lines: the 0-0 S(4) line at the lowest excitation peaks at $-$7~km~s$^{-1}$, while the more excited 0-0 S(9) and 1-0 S(1) lines peak at $-$15~km~s$^{-1}$. H$_2$O and high-$J$ CO appear to be associated with the H$_2$ 0-0 S(4) emission, which traces a gas component with a temperature of 700$-$1000 K. The H$_2$O abundance with respect to H$_2$ 0-0 S(4) is estimated to be $X$(H$_2$O)$<$1.4$\times$10$^{-5}$ in the shocked gas over an area of 13$^{\prime\prime}$. Conclusions: We resolve two distinct gas components associated with the HH 54 shock region at different velocities and excitations. This allows us to constrain the temperature of the H$_2$O emitting gas ($\leq$1000 K) and to derive correct estimates of H$_2$O abundance in the shocked gas, which is lower than what is expected from shock model predictions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.