Paper detail

First Search for Multijet Resonances in $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV $ p\bar{p}$ Collisions

We present the first model independent search for three-jet hadronic resonances within multijet events in $\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV $p\bar{p}$ collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron using the CDF II detector. Pair production of supersymmetric gluinos and squarks with hadronic R-parity violating decays is employed as an example of a new physics benchmark for this signature. Selection criteria based on the kinematic properties of an ensemble of jet combinations within each event help to extract signal from copious QCD background. Our background estimates include all-hadronic $t\bar{t}$ decays that have a signature similar to the signal. No significant excess outside the top quark mass window is observed in data with an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb$^{-1}$. We place 95% confidence level limits on the production cross section $σ(p \bar{p} \rightarrow XX^{'}) \times \rm{BR}$($\widetilde{g}\widetilde{g}$$ \rightarrow 3 {\rm jet}+3 {\rm jet})$ where $X, X' = \widetilde{g}, \widetilde{q}$, or $\widetilde{\bar{q}}$, with $\widetilde{q}$, $\widetilde{\bar{q}} \rightarrow \widetilde{g}$ + jet, as a function of gluino mass, in the range of 77 GeV/$c^2$ to 240 GeV/$c^2$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.