Paper detail

First sample of $\rm N_2H^+$ nitrogen isotopic ratio measurements in low-mass protostars

Context. The nitrogen isotopic ratio is considered an important diagnostic tool of the star formation process, and $N_2H^+$ is particularly important because it is directly linked to molecular nitrogen $N_2$. However, theoretical models still lack to provide an exhaustive explanation for the observed $^{14}N/^{15}N$ values. Aims. Recent theoretical works suggest that the $^{14}N/^{15}N$ behaviour is dominated by two competing reactions that destroy $ N_2H^+$: dissociative recombination and reaction with CO. When CO is depleted from the gas phase, if $N_2H^+$ recombination rate is lower with respect to the $N^{15}NH^+$ one, the rarer isotopologue is destroyed faster. This implies that the $N_2H^+$ isotopic ratio in protostars should be lower than the one in prestellar cores, and consistent with the elemental value of ~440. We aim to test this hypothesis, producing the first sample of $N_2H^+ / N^{15}NH^+$ measurements in low mass protostars. Methods. We observe the $N_2H^+$ and $N^{15}NH^+$ lowest rotational transition towards six young stellar objects in Perseus and Taurus molecular clouds. We model the spectra with a custom python code using a constant $T_{ex}$ approach to fit the observations. We discuss in appendix the validity of this hypothesis. The derived column densities are used to compute the nitrogen isotopic ratio. Results. Our analysis yields an average of $\rm ^{14}N/^{15}N|_{pro} = 420 \pm 15$ in the protostellar sample. This is consistent with the protosolar value of 440, and significantly lower than the average value previously obtained in a sample of prestellar objects. Conclusions. Our results are in agreement with the hypothesis that, when CO is depleted from the gas-phase, dissociative recombinations with free electrons destroy $N^{15}NH^+$ faster than $N_2H^+$, leading to high isotopic ratios in prestellar cores, where CO is frozen on dust grains.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.