Paper detail

First results from SMAUG: Characterization of Multiphase Galactic Outflows from a Suite of Local Star-Forming Galactic Disk Simulations

Large scale outflows in star-forming galaxies are observed to be ubiquitous, and are a key aspect of theoretical modeling of galactic evolution in a cosmological context, the focus of the SMAUG (Simulating Multiscale Astrophysics to Understand Galaxies) project. Gas blown out from galactic disks, similar to gas within galaxies, consists of multiple phases with large contrasts of density, temperature, and other properties. To study multiphase outflows as emergent phenomena, we run a suite of ~pc-resolution local galactic disk simulations using the TIGRESS framework. Explicit modeling of the interstellar medium (ISM), including star formation and self-consistent radiative heating plus supernova feedback, regulates ISM properties and drives the outflow. We investigate the scaling of outflow mass, momentum, energy, and metal loading factors with galactic disk properties, including star formation rate (SFR) surface density (Σ_SFR~10^{-4}-1 M_sun/kpc^2/yr), gas surface density (~1-100 M_sun/pc^2), and total midplane pressure (or weight) (~10^3-10^6 k_B cm^{-3} K). The main components of outflowing gas are mass-delivering cool gas (T~10^4 K) and energy/metal-delivering hot gas (T~10^6 K). Cool mass outflow rates measured at outflow launch points (one or two scale heights) are 1-100 times the SFR (decreasing with Σ_SFR), although in massive galaxies most mass falls back due to insufficient outflow velocity. The hot galactic outflow carries mass comparable to 10% of the SFR, together with 10-20% of the energy and 30-60% of the metal mass injected by SN feedback. The characteristic outflow velocities of both phases scale very weakly with SFR, as v_out \propto Σ_SFR^{0.1~0.2}, consistent with observations. Importantly, our analysis demonstrates that in any physically-motivated cosmological wind model, it is crucial to include at least two distinct thermal wind components.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.