Paper detail

First-principles study on the specific heat of glass at glass transition with a case study on glycerol

The standard method to determine the transition temperature (Tg) of glass transition is the jump in the specific heat. Despite this importance, standard theory for this jump is lacking. The difficulties encompass from lack of proper treatments of specific heat of liquids, hysteresis, to the timescale issue. The first part of this paper provides a non-empirical method to calculate specific heat of glass. The method consists of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations based on density-functional theory (DFT) and thermodynamics methods. The total-energy approach based on DFT enables us to calculate specific heat, irrespective of solids or liquids. A serious problem for glass-transition states is involvement of complicated energy dissipation processes, which is resolved by adiabatic MD simulations. The problems of hysteresis and the timescale issue are alleviated by restricting the scope of calculations to equilibrium states only. The second part of this paper describes an application of the theory to the specific-heat jump (Delta Cp) of glycerol in order to show the validity of the methods. Despite severe limitations due to the small size of supercells, a reasonable value for the specific-heat jump is obtained. By decomposing Delta Cp into contributions of the structural energy, phonon, and thermal expansion parts, we have a sound interpretation for the Delta Cp: the major contribution to Delta Cp comes from the change in the structural energy. From this, a neat energy diagram about the glass transition is obtained. An outcome of this study is verification of the empirical relationship between the fragility and specific-heat jump. These two energies are scaled by the ratio k=Tg/ Delta T, where Delta T is the width of the transition, through which the two quantities are interrelated. This is useful for organizing various relationships that are found empirically.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.