Paper detail

First-principles study of excitonic effects in Raman intensities

The ab initio prediction of Raman intensities for bulk solids usually relies on the hypothesis that the frequency of the incident laser light is much smaller than the band gap. However, when the photon frequency is a sizeable fraction of the energy gap, or higher, resonance effects appear. In the case of silicon, when excitonic effects are neglected, the response of the solid to light increases by nearly three orders of magnitude in the range of frequencies between the static limit and the gap. When excitonic effects are taken into account, an additional tenfold increase in the intensity is observed. We include these effects using a finite-difference scheme applied on the dielectric function obtained by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation. Our results for the Raman susceptibility of silicon show stronger agreement with experimental data compared with previous theoretical studies. For the sampling of the Brillouin zone, a double-grid technique is proposed, resulting in a significant reduction in computational effort.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.