Paper detail

First observations of the Phoebe ring in optical light

The Phoebe ring, Saturn's largest and faintest ring, lies far beyond the planet's well-known main rings. It is primarily sourced by collisions with Saturn's largest irregular satellite Phoebe, perhaps through stochastic macroscopic collisions, or through more steady micrometeoroid bombardment. The ring was discovered with the Spitzer Space Telescope at 24 $μ$m and has a normal optical depth of $\sim 2 \times 10^{-8}$ (Verbiscer et al. 2009). We report the first observations of sunlight scattered off the Phoebe ring using the Cassini spacecraft's ISS camera at optical wavelengths. We find that material between $\approx 130-210$ Saturnian radii ($R_S$) from the planet produces an I/F of $1.7 \pm 0.1 \times 10^{-11}$ per $R_S$ of the line-of-sight distance through the disk. Combining our measurements with the Spitzer infrared data, we can place constraints on the ring-particles' light-scattering properties. Depending on the particles' assumed phase function, the derived single-scattering albedo can match either photometric models of Phoebe's dark regolith or brighter sub-surface material excavated by macroscopic impacts on Phoebe.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.