First Infrared-based implications for the dust attenuation and star formation of typical Lyαα emitters

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

By stacking publicly available deep Spitzer/MIPS 24 μμm and Herschel/PACS images for 213 z≃2.18z \simeq 2.18 Lyαα Emitters (LAEs) in GOODS-South, we obtain a strong upper limit to the IR luminosity of typical LAEs and discuss their attenuation curve for the first time. The 3σ3σ upper limit LTIR3σ=1.1×1010L⊙L_{\rm TIR}^{3σ}= 1.1 \times 10^{10} L_\odot, determined from the MIPS data providing the lowest limit, gives IRX≡LTIR/LUV≤2.2IRX \equiv L_{\rm TIR}/L_{\rm UV} \leq 2.2. Here we assume that the local calibration between the 8 μμm emission and the dust SED shape and metallicity applies at high redshifts and that our LAEs have low metallicities as suggested by previous studies. The inferred escape fractions of Lyαα, 1616--3737%, and UV continuum, ≥44\ge 44%, are higher than the cosmic averages at the same epoch. The SMC attenuation curve is consistent with the IRX and the UV slope β=−1.4−0.2+0.2β= -1.4^{+0.2}_{-0.2} of our stacked LAE, while the Meurer's relation (Calzetti curve) predicts a 3.8 times higher IRX; we also discuss the validity of PACS-based LTIR3σL_{\rm TIR}^{3σ} allowing the Meurer's relation. SED fitting using the Calzetti curve also gives a ∼10\sim 10 times higher SFR than from the LTIR3σL_{\rm TIR}^{3σ} and LUVL_{\rm UV}. With M⋆=6.3−2.0+0.8×108M⊙M_{\star}=6.3^{+0.8}_{-2.0} \times10^8 \mathrm{M_{\odot}}, our LAEs lie on a lower-mass extrapolation of the star formation main sequence at z∼2z \sim 2, suggesting that the majority of z∼2z \sim 2 LAEs are mildly star forming with relatively old ages of ∼200\sim 200 Myr. The faint LTIR3σL_{\rm TIR}^{3σ} implies that LAEs contribute little to the faint (≳100μ\gtrsim 100 μJy) submm number counts by ALMA.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.