Paper detail

First eROSITA study of nearby M dwarfs and the rotation-activity relation in combination with TESS

We present the first study of nearby M dwarfs with the ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array (eROSITA) on board the Russian Spektrum-Roentgen-Gamma mission (SRG). To this end we extracted the Gaia DR2 data for the ~9000 nearby M dwarfs in the superblink proper motion catalog and calculated their stellar parameters from empirical relations with optical-IR colors. We cross-matched this catalog with the eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS) and the first eROSITA all-sky survey (eRASS1). Our sample consists of 704 stars (SpT = K5-M7). This unprecedented data base for X-ray emitting M dwarfs allowed to quantitatively constrain the mass dependence of the X-ray luminosity, and to determine the change in the activity level with respect to pre-main-sequence stars. We also combined these data with the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) observations that are available for 501 of 704 X-ray detected M dwarfs and determined the rotation period for 180 of them. With the joint eROSITA-TESS sample, and combining it with our historical X-ray and rotation data for M dwarfs, we examined the mass dependence in the saturated regime of the rotation-activity relation. A first comparison of eROSITA hardness ratios and spectra shows that 65% of our X-ray detected M dwarfs have coronal temperatures of $\sim 0.5$ keV. We investigated their long-term X-ray variability by comparing the eRASS1 and ROSAT all-sky survey (RASS) measurements. Evidence for X-ray flares is found in various parts of our analysis: directly from inspection of the eFEDS light curves, in the relation between RASS and eRASS1 X-ray luminosities, and in stars displaying X-ray emission hotter than the bulk of the sample according to the hardness ratios. Finally, we point out the need of X-ray spectroscopy for more M dwarfs to study the coronal temperature-luminosity relation, not well constrained by our eFEDS results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.