Paper detail

First detection of metric emission from a solar surge

We report the first detection of metric radio emission from a surge, observed with the Nançay Radioheliograph (NRH), STEREO and other instruments. The emission was observed during the late phase of the M9 complex event SOL2010-02-012T11:25:00, described in a previous publication and was associated with a secondary energy release, also observed in STEREO 304 Å images: there was no detectable soft X-ray emission. Triangulation of the STEREO images allowed the identification of the surge with NRH sources near the central meridian. The radio emission of the surge occurred in two phases and consisted of two sources, one located near the base of the surge, apparently at or near the site of energy release, and another in the upper part of the surge; these were best visible in the frequency range of 445.0 to about 300MHz, whereas a spectral component of different nature was observed at lower frequencies. Sub-second time variations were detected in both sources during both phases, with 0.2-0.3s a delay of the upper source with respect to the lower, suggesting superluminal velocities. This effect can be explained if the emission of the upper source was due to scattering of radiation from the source at the base of the surge. In addition, the radio emission showed signs of pulsations and spikes. We discuss possible emission mechanisms for the slow time variability component of the lower radio source. Gyrosynchrotron emission reproduced fairly well the characteristics of the observed total intensity spectrum at the start of the second phase of the event, but failed to reproduce the high degree of the observed circular polarization as well the spectra at other instances. On the other hand, type IV-like plasma emission from the fundamental could explain the high polarization and the fine structure in the dynamic spectrum; moreover, it gives projected radio source positions on the plane of the sky, as seen from STEREO-A, near the base of the surge. Taking everything into consideration, we suggest type IV-like plasma emission with a low intensity gyrosynchrotron component as the most plausible mechanism.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.