Paper detail

First detection of AlF line emission towards M-type AGB stars

The nucleosynthesis production of fluorine (F) is still a matter of debate. Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars are one of the main candidates for F production. However, their contribution to the total F budget is not fully known due to the lack of observations. In this paper, we report the detection of AlF line emission, one of the two main carriers of F in the gas-phase in the outflow of evolved stars, towards five nearby oxygen-rich AGB stars, $o$ Ceti, R Leo, IK Tau, R Dor, and W Hya. From spatially resolved observations, we estimated the AlF emitting region with a radius $\sim11R_{\star}$ for $o$ Ceti and $\sim9R_{\star}$ for R Leo. From population diagram analysis, we report the AlF column densities of $\sim 5.8\times10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $\sim 3\times10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$ for $o$ Ceti and R Leo, respectively, within these regions. For $o$ Ceti, we used the C$^{18}$O ($v=0$, $J=3-2$) observations to estimate the H$_2$ column density of the emitting region. We found a fractional abundance of $f_{\rm AlF/H_2}\sim(2.5\pm1.7)\times10^{-8}$. This gives a lower limit on the F budget in $o$ Ceti and is compatible with the solar F budget $f_{\rm F/H_2}=(5\pm2)\times10^{-8}$. For R Leo, a fractional abundance $f_{\rm AlF/H_2}=(1.2\pm0.5)\times10^{-8}$ is estimated. For other sources, we cannot precisely determine the emitting region based on the available data. Assuming an emitting region with a radius of $\sim 11R_{\star}$ and the rotational temperatures derived for $o$ Ceti and R Leo, we crudely approximated the AlF column density to be $\sim(1.2-1.5)\times10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$ in W Hya, $\sim(2.5-3.0)\times10^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$ in R Dor, and $\sim(0.6-1.0)\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$ in IK Tau. These result in fractional abundances within a range of $f_{\rm AlF/H_2}\sim(0.1-4)\times10^{-8}$ in W Hya, R Dor, and IK Tau.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.