Paper detail

First 3D Morpho-Kinematic model of Supernova Remnants. The case of VRO 42.05.01 (G 166.0+4.3)

We present the first three dimensional (3D) Morpho-Kinematic (MK) model of a supernova remnant (SNR), using as a case study the Galactic SNR VRO 42.05.01. We employed the astrophysical code SHAPE in which wide field imaging and high resolution spectroscopic data were utilized, to reconstruct its 3D morphology and kinematics. We found that the remnant consists of three basic distinctive components that we call: a "shell", a "wing" and a "hat". With respect to their kinematical behaviour, we found that the "wing" and the "shell" have similar expansion velocities (V exp = $115$$\pm 5$ km/s). The "hat" presents the lowest expansion velocity of the remnant (V exp = $90$$\pm 20$ km/s), while the upper part of the "shell" presents the highest velocity with respect to the rest of the remnant (V exp = $155$$\pm 15$ km/s). Furthermore, the whole nebula has an inclination of ~$3°- 5°$ with respect to the plane of the sky and a systemic velocity of V sys = -$17$$\pm 3$ km/s . We discuss the interpretation of our model results regarding the origin and evolution of the SNR and we suggest that VRO 42.05.01 had an interaction history with an inhomogeneous ambient medium most likely shaped by the mass outflows of its progenitor star.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.