Paper detail

Finite generators for countable group actions in the Borel and Baire category settings

For a continuous action of a countable discrete group $G$ on a Polish space $X$, a countable Borel partition $P$ of $X$ is called a generator if $G \cdot P := \{ gC : g \in G, C \in P \}$ generates the Borel $σ$-algebra of $X$. For $G = Z$, the Kolmogorov--Sinai theorem gives a measure-theoretic obstruction to the existence of finite generators: they do not exist in the presence of an invariant probability measure with infinite entropy. It was asked by Benjamin Weiss in the late 80s whether the nonexistence of any invariant probability measure guarantees the existence of a finite generator. We show that the answer is positive (in fact, there is a 32-generator) for an arbitrary countable group $G$ and $σ$-compact $X$ (in particular, for locally compact $X$). We also show that any continuous aperiodic action of $G$ on an arbitrary Polish space admits a 4-generator on a comeager set, thus giving a positive answer to a question of Alexander Kechris asked in the mid-90s. Furthermore, assuming a positive answer to Weiss's question for arbitrary Polish spaces and $G = Z$, we prove the following dichotomy: every aperiodic Borel action of $Z$ on a Polish space $X$ admits either an invariant probability measure of infinite entropy or a finite generator. As an auxiliary lemma, we prove the following statement, which may be of independent interest: every aperiodic Borel action of a countable group $G$ on a Polish space $X$ admits a $G$-equivariant Borel map to the aperiodic part of the shift action of $G$ on $2^G$. We also obtain a number of other related results, among which is a criterion for the nonexistence of non-meager weakly wandering sets for continuous actions of $Z$. A consequence of this is a negative answer to a question asked by Eigen--Hajian--Nadkarni, which was also independently answered by Benjamin Miller.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.