Paper detail

Finite Element Error Estimates for Critical Growth Semilinear Problems without Angle Conditions

In this article we consider a priori error and pointwise estimates for finite element approximations of solutions to semilinear elliptic boundary value problems in d>=2 space dimensions, with nonlinearities satisfying critical growth conditions. It is well-understood how mesh geometry impacts finite element interpolant quality, and leads to the reasonable notion of shape regular simplex meshes. It is also well-known how to perform both mesh generation and simplex subdivision, in arbitrary space dimension, so as to guarantee the entire hierarchy of nested simplex meshes produced through subdivision continue to satisfy shape regularity. However, much more restrictive angle conditions are needed for basic a priori quasi-optimal error estimates, as well as for a priori pointwise estimates. These angle conditions, which are particularly difficult to satisfy in three dimensions in any type of unstructured or adaptive setting, are needed to gain pointwise control of the nonlinearity through discrete maximum principles. This represents a major gap in finite element approximation theory for nonlinear problems on unstructured meshes, and in particular for adaptive methods. In this article, we close this gap in the case of semilinear problems with critical or sub-critical nonlinear growth, by deriving a priori estimates directly, without requiring the discrete maximum principle, and hence eliminating the need for restrictive angle conditions. Our main result is a type of local Lipschitz property that relies only on the continuous maximum principle, together with the growth condition. We also show that under some additional smoothness assumptions, the a priori error estimate itself is enough to give pointwise control the discrete solution, without the need for restrictive angle conditions. Numerical experiments confirm our theoretical conclusions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.