Paper detail

Finite element analysis of neuronal electric fields: the effect of heterogeneous resistivity

Simulation of extracellular fields is one of the substantial methods used in the area of computational neuroscience. Its most common usage is validation of experimental methods as EEG and extracellular spike recordings or modeling of physiological phenomena which can not be easily determined empirically. Continuous experimental work has been re-raising the importance of polarization effects between neuronal structures to neuronal communication. As this effects relies on very small potential changes, better modeling methods are necessary to quantify the weak electrical fields in the microscopic scale in a more realistic way. An important factor of influence on local field effects in the hippocampal formation is the heterogeneous resistivity of extracellular tissue. The vast majority of modeling studies consider the extracellular space to be homogeneous while experimentally, it has been shown that the stratum pyramidale has two times higher resistivity then other hippocampal layers. Common simulation methods for extracellular electrical fields based on the point source approximation are bound to describe the resistance of the space with a single, linear factor. We propose that models should be based on the space- and time-dependent Maxwell equations in order to account for heterogeneous properties of the extracellular space and specific arrangements of neurons in dense hippocampal layers. To demonstrate the influence of heterogeneous extracellular resistivity and neuronal spatial orientation on modeling results, we combine solutions of classical compartment models with spatiotemporal PDEs solved by the FEM. With the help of these methods, we show that the inclusion of heterogeneous resistivity has a substantial impact on voltages in close proximity to emitting neurons, increasing the extracellular potentials substantially compared to the homogeneous variant.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.