Finite-dimensional representations of minimal nilpotent W-algebras and zigzag algebras

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let g\frak g be a simple finite-dimensional Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field F\mathbb F of characteristic 0. We denote by U⁡(g)\operatorname{U}(\frak g) the universal enveloping algebra of g\frak g. To any nilpotent element e∈ge\in \frak g one can attach an associative (and noncommutative as a general rule) algebra U⁡(g, e)\operatorname{U}({\frak g},~e) which is in a proper sense a "tensor factor" of U⁡(g)\operatorname{U}(\frak g). In this article we consider the case in which g\frak g is simple and ee belongs of the minimal nonzero nilpotent orbit of g\frak g. Under these assumptions U⁡(g,e)\operatorname{U}({\frak g}, e) was described explicitly in terms of generators and relations. One can expect that the representation theory of U⁡(g,e)\operatorname{U}({\frak g}, e) would be very similar to the representation theory of U⁡(g)\operatorname{U}(\frak g). For example one can guess that the category of finite-dimensional U⁡(g,e)\operatorname{U}({\frak g}, e)-modules is semisimple. The goal of this article is to show that this is the case if g\frak g is not simply-laced. We also show that, if g\frak g is simply-laced and is not of type AnA_n, then the regular block of finite-dimensional U⁡(g,e)\operatorname{U}({\frak g}, e)-modules is equivalent to the category of finite-dimensional modules of a zigzag algebra.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.