Paper detail

Fine-tuning and the doublet-triplet splitting problem in the minimal $SU(5)$ GUT

In this paper we analyse the doublet-triplet splitting problem in the minimal non-super-symmetric $SU(5)$ GUT. We take into account the full symmetry breaking pattern with both high scale $SU(5)$ breaking and electroweak symmetry breaking. Our analysis shows that the only phenomenologically acceptable model has three vevs, with a strong hierarchy determined by the minimization conditions. The amount of fine-tuning in the model is then numerically evaluated by looking at the effect of variation of input parameters on both the minimization conditions and the bosonic masses. Regarding the vevs as output parameters, a large amount of fine-tuning is required in this scenario, which is an expression of the doublet-triplet splitting problem. We show that this problem is more general, since a model with coupled scalar sectors will in general never realise a hierarchy in vevs. To avoid these problems we advocate imposing the desired hierarchy in vevs as part of the theory. We argue for this viewpoint because the $SU(5)$ breaking and electroweak symmetry breaking need to be adjusted to each other anyway and cannot be regarded as independent mechanisms. We suggest that not only the symmetry breaking pattern needs to be imposed, but also the scales at which the breakings happen. We show quantitatively that the generic theory with hierarchy imposed does not require any fine-tuning of the free parameters which can all be natural and perturbative as desired.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.