Paper detail

Fine-Structure Constant Connects the Polarizability of Atoms and Vacuum

We examine the recently derived quantum-mechanical relation between atomic polarizabilities and equilibrium internuclear distances in van der Waals (vdW) bonded diatomic systems [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 121}, 183401 (2018)]. For homonuclear dimers, this relation is described by the compact formula $α_{\rm m}^{\rm q} = ΦR_{\rm vdW}^7$, where the constant factor in front of the vdW radius was determined empirically. Here, we derive $Φ= (4πε_0/a_0^4) \times α^{4/3}$ expressed in terms of the vacuum electric permittivity $ε_0$, the Bohr radius $a_0$, and the fine-structure constant $α$. The validity of the obtained formula is confirmed by estimating the value of the fine-structure constant from non-relativistic quantum-mechanical calculations of atomic polarizabilities and equilibrium internuclear vdW distances. The presented derivation allows to interpret the fine-structure constant as the ratio between the polarizability densities of vacuum and matter, whereas the vdW radius becomes a geometrical length scale of atoms endowed by the vacuum field.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.