Paper detail

Fine properties of solutions to the Cauchy problem for a Fast Diffusion Equation with Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg weights

We investigate fine global properties of nonnegative, integrable solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Fast Diffusion Equation with weights (WFDE) $u_t=|x|^γ\mathrm{div}\left(|x|^{-β}\nabla u^m\right)$ posed on $(0,+\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^d$, with $d\ge 3$, in the so-called good fast diffusion range $m_c<m<1$, within the range of parameters $γ, β$, optimal for the validity of the so-called Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. It is a natural question to ask in which sense such solutions behave like the Barenblatt $\mathfrak{B}$ (fundamental solution): for instance, asymptotic convergence, i.e. $\|u(t)-\mathfrak{B}(t)\|_{{\rm L}^p(\mathbb{R}^d)}\xrightarrow[]{t\to\infty}0$, is well known for all $1\le p\le \infty$, while only few partial results tackle a finer analysis of the tail behaviour. We characterize the maximal set of data $\mathcal{X}\subset{\rm L}^1_+(\mathbb{R}^d)$ that produces solutions which are pointwise trapped between two Barenblatt (Global Harnack Principle), and uniformly converge in relative error (UREC), i.e. ${\rm d}_\infty(u(t))=\|u(t)/\mathcal{B}(t)-1\|_{{\rm L}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^d)}\xrightarrow[]{t\to\infty}0$. Such characterization is in terms of an integral condition on $u(t=0)$. To the best of our knowledge, analogous issues for the linear heat equation $m=1$, do not possess such clear answers. Our characterization is also new for the classical, non-weighted, FDE. We are able to provide minimal rates of convergence to $\mathcal{B}$ in different norms. Such rates are almost optimal in the non weighted case, and become optimal for radial solutions. To complete the panorama, we show that solutions with data in ${\rm L}^1_+(\mathbb{R}^d)\setminus\mathcal{X}$, preserve the same &#34;fat&#34; spatial tail for all times, hence UREC fails.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.