Paper detail

Finding the critical decay index in solar prominence eruptions

The background field is assumed to play prime role in the erupting structures like prominences. In the flux rope models, the critical decay index ($n_c$) is a measure of the rate at which background field intensity decreases with height over the flux rope or erupting structure. In the real observations, the critical height of the background field is unknown, so a typical value of $n_{c}=1.5$ is adopted from the numerical studies. In this study, we determined the $n_c$ of 10 prominence eruptions (PEs). The prominence height in 3D is derived from two-perspective observations of \textit{Solar Dynamics Observatory} and \textit{Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory}. Synoptic maps of photospheric radial magnetic field are used to construct the background field in the corona. During the eruption, the height-time curve of the sample events exhibits the slow and fast-rise phases and is fitted with the linear-cum-exponential model. From this model, the onset height of fast-rise motion is determined and is considered as the critical height for the onset of the torus-instability because the erupting structure is allowed to expand exponentially provided there is no strapping background field. Corresponding to the critical height, the $n_c$ values of our sample events are varied to be in the range of 0.8-1.3. Additionally, the kinematic analysis suggests that the acceleration of PEs associated with flares are significantly enhanced compared to flare-less PEs. We found that the flare magnetic reconnection is the dominant contributor than the torus-instability to the acceleration process during the fast-rise phase of flare-associated PEs in low corona ($<1.3R_{\odot}$).

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.