Paper detail

Finding matched rms envelopes in rf linacs: A Hamiltonian approach

We present a new method for obtaining matched solutions of the rms envelope equations. In this approach, the envelope equations are first expressed in Hamiltonian form. The Hamiltonian defines a nonlinear mapping, $\cal M$, and for periodic transport systems the fixed points of the one-period map are the matched envelopes. Expanding the Hamiltonian around a fiducial trajectory one obtains a linear map, $M$, that describes trajectories (rms envelopes) near the fiducial trajectory. Using $\cal M$ and $M$ we construct a contraction mapping that can be used to obtain the matched envelopes. The algorithm is quadratically convergent. Using the zero-current matched parameters as starting values, the contraction mapping typically converges in a few to several iterations. Since our approach uses numerical integration to obtain all the mappings, it includes the effects of nonidealized, $z$-dependent transverse and longitudinal focusing fields. We present numerical examples including finding a matched beam in a quadrupole channel with rf bunchers.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.