Paper detail

Finding Inverse Document Frequency Information in BERT

For many decades, BM25 and its variants have been the dominant document retrieval approach, where their two underlying features are Term Frequency (TF) and Inverse Document Frequency (IDF). The traditional approach, however, is being rapidly replaced by Neural Ranking Models (NRMs) that can exploit semantic features. In this work, we consider BERT-based NRMs and study if IDF information is present in the NRMs. This simple question is interesting because IDF has been indispensable for the traditional lexical matching, but global features like IDF are not explicitly learned by neural language models including BERT. We adopt linear probing as the main analysis tool because typical BERT based NRMs utilize linear or inner-product based score aggregators. We analyze input embeddings, representations of all BERT layers, and the self-attention weights of CLS. By studying MS-MARCO dataset with three BERT-based models, we show that all of them contain information that is strongly dependent on IDF.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.