Paper detail

Finding Approximate Nash Equilibria of Bimatrix Games via Payoff Queries

We study the deterministic and randomized query complexity of finding approximate equilibria in bimatrix games. We show that the deterministic query complexity of finding an $ε$-Nash equilibrium when $ε< \frac{1}{2}$ is $Ω(k^2)$, even in zero-one constant-sum games. In combination with previous results \cite{FGGS13}, this provides a complete characterization of the deterministic query complexity of approximate Nash equilibria. We also study randomized querying algorithms. We give a randomized algorithm for finding a $(\frac{3 - \sqrt{5}}{2} + ε)$-Nash equilibrium using $O(\frac{k \cdot \log k}{ε^2})$ payoff queries, which shows that the $\frac{1}{2}$ barrier for deterministic algorithms can be broken by randomization. For well-supported Nash equilibria (WSNE), we first give a randomized algorithm for finding an $ε$-WSNE of a zero-sum bimatrix game using $O(\frac{k \cdot \log k}{ε^4})$ payoff queries, and we then use this to obtain a randomized algorithm for finding a $(\frac{2}{3} + ε)$-WSNE in a general bimatrix game using $O(\frac{k \cdot \log k}{ε^4})$ payoff queries. Finally, we initiate the study of lower bounds against randomized algorithms in the context of bimatrix games, by showing that randomized algorithms require $Ω(k^2)$ payoff queries in order to find a $\frac{1}{6k}$-Nash equilibrium, even in zero-one constant-sum games. In particular, this rules out query-efficient randomized algorithms for finding exact Nash equilibria.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.