Paper detail

Finding a maximal element of a convex set through its characteristic cone: An application to finding a strictly complementary solution

In order to express a polyhedron as the (Minkowski) sum of a polytope and a polyhedral cone, Motzkin (1936) made a transition from the polyhedron to a polyhedral cone. Based on his excellent idea, we represent a set by a characteristic cone. By using this representation, we then reach four main results: (i) expressing a closed convex set containing no line as the direct sum of the convex hull of its extreme points and conical hull of its extreme directions, (ii) establishing a convex programming (CP) based framework for determining a maximal element-an element with the maximum number of positive components-of a convex set, (iii) developing a linear programming problem for finding a relative interior point of a polyhedron, and (iv) proposing two procedures for the identification of a strictly complementary solution in linear programming.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.