Paper detail

Finding a consensus on credible features among several paleoclimate reconstructions

We propose a method to merge several paleoclimate time series into one that exhibits a consensus on the features of the individual times series. The paleoclimate time series can be noisy, nonuniformly sampled and the dates at which the paleoclimate is reconstructed can have errors. Bayesian inference is used to model the various sources of uncertainty and smoothing of the posterior distribution of the consensus is used to capture its credible features in different time scales. The technique is demonstrated by analyzing a collection of six Holocene temperature reconstructions from Finnish Lapland based on various biological proxies. Although the paper focuses on paleoclimate time series, the proposed method can be applied in other contexts where one seeks to infer features that are jointly supported by an ensemble of irregularly sampled noisy time series.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.