Paper detail

Financial LPPL Bubbles with Mean-Reverting Noise in the Frequency Domain

The log-periodic power law (LPPL) is a model of asset prices during endogenous bubbles. A major open issue is to verify the presence of LPPL in price sequences and to estimate the LPPL parameters. Estimation is complicated by the fact that daily LPPL returns are typically orders of magnitude smaller than measured price returns, suggesting that noise obscures the underlying LPPL dynamics. However, if noise is mean-reverting, it would quickly cancel out over subsequent measurements. In this paper, we attempt to reject mean-reverting noise from price sequences by exploiting frequency-domain properties of LPPL and of mean reversion. First, we calculate the spectrum of mean-reverting \ou noise and devise estimators for the noise's parameters. Then, we derive the LPPL spectrum by breaking it down into its two main characteristics of power law and of log-periodicity. We compare price spectra with noise spectra during historical bubbles. In general, noise was strong also at low frequencies and, even if LPPL underlied price dynamics, LPPL would be obscured by noise.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.