Paper detail

Figure-of-merit for Semi-transparent Solar Cells

Semi-transparent Solar Cells (ST-SCs) has emerged as one of the most prominent energy harvesting technology that combines the benefits of light transparency and light-to-electricity conversion. The biggest opportunities for such technologies lie in their integration as windows and skylights within energy-sustainable buildings or combining them with other solar cell technologies in tandem configuration. The performance of ST-SCs is mainly determined by the trade-off between the competing parameters of the capability to convert the incident light into electricity while allowing some parts to transmit providing transparency through the device. Depending on the target application, the selection of ST-SCs is a tricky affair as some devices might offer high efficiency but compromises transparency and vice-versa. On the other way around, this is again not helped by the fact that due to advancements in materials engineering, processing, and characterization, a vastly different combination of efficiency and transparency has been reported by research groups. So, in order to quantify the performance of ST-SCs, we proposed, a figure-of-merit (FoM) which can be used as a tool that can help in analysing and comparing the performance among various ST-SCs. The defined FoM focuses on the power conversion efficiency of the device, bifaciality factor, transmittance in the desired region, and that corresponding to 550 nm wavelength. Additionally, in this work, we have been shown how the proposed FoM can be correlated for tandem and building-integrated photovoltaics applications. Based on these resultant parameters, FoM is calculated and compared for different device architectures available in the literature. The proposed FoM shall serve as a meaningful guiding path to the researchers for the development of advanced ST-SCs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.