Paper detail

Field Theory on Infinitesimal-Lattice Spaces

Equivalence in physics is discussed on the basis of experimental data accompanied by experimental errors. It is pointed out that the introduction of the equivalence being consistent with the mathematical definition is possible only in theories constructed on non-standard number spaces by taking the experimental errors as infinitesimal numbers. Following the idea for the equivalence, a new description of space-time $\SL$ in terms of infinitesimal-lattice points on non-standard real number space $\SR$ is proposed. By using infinitesimal neighborhoos ($\MON$) of real number r on $\SL$ we can make a space $\SM$ which is isomorphic to $\RE$ as additive group. Therefore, every point on $(\SM)^N$ automatically has the internal confined-subspace $\MON$. A field theory on $\SL$ is proposed. It is shown that U(1) and SU(N) symmetries on the space $(\SM)^N$ are induced from the internal substructure $(\MON)^N$. Quantized state describing configuration space is constructed on $(\SM)^N$. We see that Lorentz and general relativistic transformations are also represented by operators which involve the U(1) and SU(N) internal symmetries.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.