Paper detail

Field Distortions in the CPC2 Plate Data

Residuals of a conventional plate adjustment of 5,687 plates of the Second Cape Photographic Catalogue (CPC2) using the Southern Reference Star (SRS) Catalog were analyzed to search for systematic errors depending on the location of the star images on the plate. Even after correcting for third order optical distortion, such coordinate depending systematic errors, hereafter called field distortion pattern (FDP), were detected which are nearly constant with respect to plate epoch, location in the sky and apparent brightness of the stars. The mean amplitude of these field distortions was found to be 57 milliarcseconds (mas), which is $0.57 \ μm$ on a plate. Due to the favorable 4--fold overlap observing principle of the CPC2, the effect on the mean catalog position is only a fraction of that. But the FDP affects a block adjustment (BA) of the entire set of data on a 100 mas level at the border of the CPC2 sky coverage. A comparison with FDP's found in other projects was made and physical reasons for the FDP were investigated. Publication of a new release of the CPC2 is planned after the Hipparcos Output Catalog becomes available in 1996.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.