Paper detail

Field-dependent surface resistance of a superconducting RF cavity caused by surface impurity

Q-slope issue, which is caused by the field dependent surface resistance, puzzled people for a long time in SRF fields. In this paper, we related the Q-slope with surface treatments; and proposed a surface-impurity model to explain the field-dependent of surface resistance of SRF cavities. Eighteen cavity-test results have been analyzed to examine the model. These cavities were treated by different recipes: Nitrogen-doping; BCP and HF-rinsing; EP with 120°C baking; and EP without 120°C baking. The performance of these cavities, which is normally represented by cavity quality factor versus accelerating gradient or surface magnetic field curves (Q0 vs. Eacc or Q0 vs. B), has included all types of Q-slope, such as Low-field Q-slope, Medium-field Q-slope, and Anti-Q-slope. The data fittings are quite successful; the fitting results will be shown. The model can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the surface treatments. At last, the paper discussed the way to build a high-Q high-gradient SRF cavity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.