Paper detail

Fidelity-Naturalness Evaluation of Single Image Super Resolution

We study the problem of evaluating super resolution methods. Traditional evaluation methods usually judge the quality of super resolved images based on a single measure of their difference with the original high resolution images. In this paper, we proposed to use both fidelity (the difference with original images) and naturalness (human visual perception of super resolved images) for evaluation. For fidelity evaluation, a new metric is proposed to solve the bias problem of traditional evaluation. For naturalness evaluation, we let humans label preference of super resolution results using pair-wise comparison, and test the correlation between human labeling results and image quality assessment metrics' outputs. Experimental results show that our fidelity-naturalness method is better than the traditional evaluation method for super resolution methods, which could help future research on single-image super resolution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.