Paper detail

Few-Shot Object Detection with Proposal Balance Refinement

Few-shot object detection has gained significant attention in recent years as it has the potential to greatly reduce the reliance on large amounts of manually annotated bounding boxes. While most existing few-shot object detection literature primarily focuses on bounding box classification by obtaining as discriminative feature embeddings as possible, we emphasize the necessity of handling the lack of intersection-over-union (IoU) variations induced by a biased distribution of novel samples. In this paper, we analyze the IoU imbalance that is caused by the relatively high number of low-quality region proposals, and reveal that it plays a critical role in improving few-shot learning capabilities. The well-known two stage fine-tuning technique causes insufficient quality and quantity of the novel positive samples, which hinders the effective object detection of unseen novel classes. To alleviate this issue, we present a few-shot object detection model with proposal balance refinement, a simple yet effective approach in learning object proposals using an auxiliary sequential bounding box refinement process. This process enables the detector to be optimized on the various IoU scores through additional novel class samples. To fully exploit our sequential stage architecture, we revise the fine-tuning strategy and expose the Region Proposal Network to the novel classes in order to provide increased learning opportunities for the region-of-interest (RoI) classifiers and regressors. Our extensive assessments on PASCAL VOC and COCO demonstrate that our framework substantially outperforms other existing few-shot object detection approaches.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.