Paper detail

Few-Shot Learning Pipeline for Monkeypox Skin Disease Classification Using CNN Feature Extractors

Despite the strong performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in disease classification, their effectiveness often depends on access to large annotated datasets, which is an impractical requirement for emerging or rare conditions such as Monkeypox. To overcome this limitation, we propose a few-shot learning (FSL) framework that employs SimpleShot, a lightweight, non-parametric, inductive classifier, for Monkeypox and pox-like skin disease recognition from limited labeled examples. The proposed pipeline passes the skin lesion images through a frozen, pretrained CNN backbone to obtain feature embeddings, which are then classified via SimpleShot using nearest-centroid comparisons in a normalized embedding space. We systematically benchmark six widely used CNN backbones as feature extractors under consistent experimental settings, enabling fair comparison. Experiments on three publicly available datasets (MSLD v1.0, MSID, and MSLD v2.0) are conducted across 2-way, 4-way, and 6-way tasks with 1-shot, 5-shot, and 10-shot configurations. Among all models, MobileNetV2_100 consistently achieves the highest accuracy. In addition, we present a cross-dataset evaluation for Monkeypox classification, revealing that binary Mpox-vs-Others transfer remains comparatively stable while multi-class performance degrades significantly under domain shift. Together, these results demonstrate the practical utility of combining inductive FSL methods with lightweight CNN backbones and highlight the importance of domain robustness for reliable real-world clinical deployment.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.