Paper detail

Fermionic warm dark matter produces galaxy cores in the observed scales because of quantum mechanics

We derive the main physical galaxy properties: mass, halo radius, phase space density and velocity dispersion from a semiclassical gravitational approach in which fermionic WDM is treated quantum mechanically. They turn out to be compatible with observations. Pauli Principle implies for the fermionic DM phase-space density Q(r) = rho(r)/sigma^3(r) the quantum bound Q(r) < K m^4/hbar^3, where m is the DM particle mass, sigma(r) is the DM velocity dispersion and K is a pure number of order one which we estimate. N-body galaxy simulations produce a divergent Q(r) at r = 0 violating this quantum bound. Combining this bound with the behaviour of Q(r) from simulations, the virial and galaxy data on Q implies lower bounds on the halo radius and a minimal distance r_{min} at which classical dynamics for DM fermions breaks down. This quantum bound rules out the presence of galaxy cusps for fermionic WDM, in agreement with astronomical observations, which show that the DM halos are cored. We show that compact dwarf galaxies are quantum objects supported against gravity by the fermionic WDM quantum pressure. Quantum mechanical calculations become necessary to compute galaxy structures at kpc scales and below. Classical N-body simulations are not valid at scales below r_{min}. We apply the Thomas-Fermi semiclassical approach to fermionic WDM galaxies and find the physical magnitudes: mass, halo radius, phase-space density, velocity dispersion, consistent with observations especially for compact dwarf galaxies. Namely, fermionic WDM treated quantum mechanically, as it must be, reproduces the sizes of the observed cores. The lightest known galaxy Willman I implies a lower bound for the WDM particle mass m > 0.96 keV. These results and the observed galaxies with halo radius > 30 pc and halo mass > 4 10^5 M_sun provide further indication that the WDM particle mass m is in the range 1-2 keV.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.