Paper detail

Fermionic dark matter via UV and IR freeze-in and its possible X-ray signature

Non-observation of any dark matter signature at various direct detection experiments over the last decade keeps indicating that immensely popular WIMP paradigm may not be the actual theory of particle dark matter. Non-thermal dark matter produced through freeze-in is an attractive proposal, naturally explaining null results by virtue of its feeble couplings with the Standard Model (SM) particles. We consider a minimal extension of the SM by two gauge singlet fields namely, a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-odd fermion $χ$ and a pseudo scalar $\tildeϕ$, where the former has interactions with the SM particles only at dimension five level and beyond. This introduces natural suppression in the interactions of $χ$ by a heavy new physics scale $Λ$ and forces $χ$ to be a non-thermal dark matter candidate. We have studied production of $χ$ in detail taking into account both ultra-violate (UV), infra-red (IR) as well as mixed UV-IR freeze-in and found that for $10^{10}{\rm GeV}\leqΛ\leq 10^{15}{\rm GeV}$, $χ$ is dominantly produced via UV and mixed UV-IR freeze-in when reheat temperature $T_{RH}\gtrsim 10^4$ GeV and below which the production is dominated by IR and mixed freeze-in. Furthermore, we have considered the cascade annihilation $χ\barχ \rightarrow \tildeϕ\tildeϕ\rightarrow 4γ$ to address the longstanding $\sim3.5$ keV X-ray line observed from various galaxies and galaxy clusters. We have found that the long-lived intermediate state $\tildeϕ$ modifies dark matter density around the galactic centre to an effective density $ρ_{eff}$ which strongly depends on the decay length of $\tildeϕ$. Finally, the allowed parameter space in $Λ-g$ plane ($g$ is the coupling between $χ\barχ$ and $\tildeϕ$) is obtained by comparing our result with the XMM Newton observed X-ray flux from the centre of Milky Way galaxy in $2σ$ range.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.